Template talk:Canadian Forces Bases
Appearance
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Scope
[edit]Should this be renamed to "Canadian Forces facilities" to reflect its scope? That way we can justify adding the CFS, CFD, and CFAD facilities. We don't have to rename the template (too much work), but probably the title at the top.Ng.j (talk) 01:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- sounds like a good idea to me..Moxy (talk) 02:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Now that I think about it, if we call it "Canadian Forces facilities" we will probably see every Primary Reserve armoury included as well, which we definitely do not want (there are hundreds). Perhaps we can keep it as is, but specify the scope here in discussion.
- I think that all of the CFB, CFS, CFD, CFAD, and major training installations like LFCATC Meaford should be included. Looking for more input... Ng.j (talk) 07:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Including any and all facilities in the template would be ridiculous. A good idea would be to create a single page for all the Primary Reserve armouries and put that page on the template. CFB, CFS, CFD, CFAD, TCs, etc. should be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.94.34.166 (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
CFB Winnipeg
[edit]Why is CFB Winnipeg listed under both defunct and current? The article suggests that its still open and being actively used. Gsingh (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Template-Class Canada-related articles
- NA-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Template-Class military history articles
- Template-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- Template-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles